- Open Access
Public Health Genomics (PHG): From Scientific Considerations to Ethical Integration
Genomics, Society and Policy volume 3, Article number: 14 (2007)
Recent advances in our understanding of the human genome have raised high hopes for the creation of personalized medicine able to predict diseases well before they occur, or that will lead to individualized and therefore more effective treatments. This possibility of a more accurate science of the prevention and surveillance of disease also illuminates the field of public health, where the translation of genomic knowledge could provide tools enhancing the capacity of public health authorities to promote health and prevent diseases. But beyond scientific considerations, the use of genomics in public health research and interventions gives rise to several ethical and social issues of great importance. Considering the impact that PHG could have on the future of public health while still paying attention to the uncertainty surrounding the use of genomic databases for the benefit of populations, this article seeks to explore the promise of genomics in public health and the ethical issues that emerge from its application.
The authors are at Programmes de bioéthique, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada. Correspondence to email@example.com.
J. Bell. Predicting disease using genomics. Nature 2004; 429: 453–56.
W. Kalow. Pharmacogenetics and personalized medicine. Fundamental and Clinical Pharmacology 2002; 16: 337–42.
W.E. Evans and M.V. Relling. Moving towards individualized medicine with pharmacogenomics. Nature 2004; 429: 464–68.
M. Gwinn and M.J. Khoury. Research Priorities for Public Health Sciences in the Postgenomic Era. Genetics in Medicine 2002; 4 (6): 410–11.
H. Colhoun et al. Problems of reporting genetic associations with complex outcomes. Lancet 2003; 361: 865–72.
G. Davey Smith et al. Genetic epidemiology and public health: hope, hype and future prospects. Lancet 2005; 366: 1484–98.
M.J. Khoury et al. (eds.) 2000. Genetics and public health in the 21st century: Using genetic information to improve health and prevent disease. New York: Oxford University Press.
A. Brand et al. Getting ready for the future: integration of genomics into public health research, policy and practice in Europe and globally. Community Genetics 2006; 9: 67–71.
D. Alexander et al. A vision of the future of newborn screening. Pediatrics 2006; 117: 350–4.
N.A. Holtzman. What role for public health in genetics and vice versa?. Community Genetics 2006; 9: 8–20.
K. Ries Merikangas and N. Risch. Genomic Priorities and Public Health. Science 2003; 302: 599–601.
K. Freeman. Harnessing the HGP for public health. Environmental Health Perspectives 2004; 112 (7): 403.
K. Gunderson et al. A genome-wide scalable SNP genotyping assay using microarray technology. Nature Genetics 2005; 37: 549–554.
S. Shostak. Locating gene-environment interaction: at the intersection of genetics and public health. Social Science & Medicine 2003; 56: 2327–2342.
J. Dausset. Les bases de la médecine prédictive. ADSP (Haut comité de la santé publique) 2001; 37: 66–67.
E. Kunstmann and J.T. Epplen. Genetic counseling for the public? Community Genetics 2006; 9: 62–66.
J. Ziebuhr. Molecular Biology of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus. Current Opinion in Microbiology. August 2004; 7 (4): 412–9.
R.E. Johnston. A Candidate Vaccine for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome. The New England Journal of Medicine 2004; 351 (8): 827–8.
R. Freeman et al. Use of rapid genomic deletion typing to monitor a tuberculosis outbreak within an urban homeless population. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2005; 43 (11): 5550–54.
A.J. Frodsham and A.V.S. Hill. Genetics of infectious diseases. Human Molecular Genetics 2004; 13 (2): 187–94.
Davey Smith, op. cit. note 7.
M.J. Khoury et al. The emergence of epidemiology in the genomics age. International Journal of Epidemiology 2004; 33: 936–44.
K.J. Maschke. Navigating an ethical patchwork — human gene banks. Nature Biotechnology 2005; 23 (5): 539–45.
J. Kaiser. Biobanks. Population databases boom from Iceland to the U.S. Science 2002; 298 (5596): 1158–61.
Gwinn & Khoury, op. cit. note 5.
M.J. Khoury et al. Population Screening in the Age of Genomic Medicine. New England Journal of Medicine 2003; 348 (1): 50–58.
M. Müller et al. Nutrigenomics: goals and strategies. Nature Reviews Genetics 2003; 4: 315–22.
Y.H. Hsieh et al. Real-time forecast of multiphase outbreak. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2006; 12 (1): 122–7.
E. Mykhaloskiy et al. The Global Public Health Intelligence Network and early warning outbreak detection: a canadian contribution to global public health. Canadian Journal of Public Health 2006; 97 (1): 42–4.
M. Gwinn and M.J. Koury. Genomics and Public Health in the United States: Signposts on the Translation Highway. Community Genetics 2006; 9: 21–26.
K.Y. Yoo et al. Genomic epidemiology cohorts in Korea: present and the future. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention 2005; 6 (3): 238–43.
M.J. Khoury. The case for a global human genome epidemiology initiative. Nature Genetics. 2004; 36 (10): 1027–28.
H.E. Wichmann et al. KORA-gen. Resources for population genetics. Controls and a broad spectrum of disease phenotypes. Gesundheitswesen 2005; 67 (1): 26–30.
Khoury, op. cit. note 34.
Wichmann et al, op. cit. note 35.
A.S. Noonan. Integrating genomics into US public health. Genetics in Medicine 2002; 4 (6): 68S–71S.
B.H. Robertson et al. New microbiology tools for public health and their implications. Annual Review of Public Health 2005; 26: 281–302.
Human Genome Epidemiology Network www.cdc.gov/genomics/hugenet/default.htm (accessed 31 August. 2006)
Gwinn & Khoury, op. cit. note 31.
R. Chadwick et al. Solidarity and equity: new ethical frameworks for genetic databases. Nature Reviews Genetics 2001; 2 (4): 318–321.
F.S. Collins. The case for a US prospective cohort study of genes and environment. Nature 2004; 429: 475–77.
I. Rabino. Genetic Testing and Its Implications: Human Genetics Researchers Grapple with Ethical Issues. Science, Technology & Human Values 2003; 28 (3): 365–402.
Shostak, op. cit. note 15.
W. van den Daele. The spectre of coercion: is public health genetics the route to policies of enforced disease prevention? Community Genetics 2006; 9: 40–49.
M.H.V. Van Regenmortel. Reductionism and complexity in human molecular biology. Embo Report. 2004; 5 (1): 1016–1020.
T.H. Murray. 2000. Genetic Exceptionalism and ‘Future Diaries’: Is Genetic Information Different from Other Medical Information?, in Genetic Secrets: Protecting Privacy and Confidentiality in the Genetic Era. M.A. Rothstein, ed. New Haven: Yale University Press.
J. Hodge. Ethical Issues Concerning Genetic Testing and Screening in Public Health. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C 2004; 125C: 66–70.
F.S. Collins et al. Heredity and Humanity: Have no fear. Genes aren’t everything. The New Republican 2001; June 25: 27–29.
Murray, op. cit. note 48.
A.W. Toga and P.M. Thomson. Genetics of brain structure and intelligence. Annual Review of Neuroscience 2005; 28: 1–23.
A. Cambon-Thomsen et al. Populational Genetic Databases: Is a Specific Ethical and Legal Framework Necessary? GenEdit 2005; 3 (1): 1–13.
UNESCO. 2003. International Declaration on Human Genetic Data. Paris. October 16.
UNESCO. 1997. Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights. Paris. November 11.
H. Thortsteindottir et al. Genomics. a global public good? Lancet 2003; 361 (9361): 891–92.
B.M. Knoppers. Of Genomics and Public Health: Building Public Goods? CMAJ 2005; 173 (10): 1185–86.
T. Caufield et al. DNA databases and consent: a suggested policy option involving an authorization model. BMC Medical Ethics 2003; 4 (1): 1–4.
B.M. Knoppers. Consent revisited: points to consider. Health Law Review 2005; 13 (2-3): 33–38.
V. Arnason. Coding and consent: moral challenges of the database project in Iceland. Bioethics 2004; 18 (1): 27–49.
B.S. Elger et al. Consent and anonymization in research involving biobanks: differing terms and norms present serious barriers to an international framework. EMBO reports 2006; 7 (7): 661–6.
B.M. Knoppers et al. The Babel of genetic data terminology. Nature Biotechnology 2005; 23 (8): 925–7.
Cambon-Thomsen, op. cit. note 53.
E.W. Clayton. Ethical. legal and social implications of genomic medicine. The New England Journal of Medicine 2003; 349: 562–9.
Y. Joly et al. Genetic information and life insurance: a ‘real’ risk?. European Journal of Human Genetics 2003; 11 (8): 561–4.
M.A. Rothstein. What is genetic discrimination and when and how can it be prevented? Genetics in Medicine 2001; 3 (5): 354–8.
R. Bayer et al. The Genesis of Public Health Ethics. Bioethics 2004; 18 (6): 473–492.
J.F. Childress et al. Public Health Ethics: Mapping The Terrain. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 2002; 30 (2): 171–8.
D. Callahan et al. Ethics and Public Health: Forging a Strong Relationship. American Journal of Public Health. 2002; 92 (2): 169–76.
A. Harris et al. The Exercise of Public Health Powers in an Era of Human Rights: the Particular Problems of Tuberculosis. Journal of the Royal Institute of Public Health 2004; 118: 313–22.
van den Daele, op. cit. note 46.
O. O’Neill. Public Health or Clinical Ethics: Thinking Beyond Borders. Ethics and International Affairs. 2004; 16 (2): 35–45.
Bayer, op. cit. note 68.
R. Andorno. The Precautionary Principle: A New Legal Standard For a Technological Age. Journal of International Biotechnology Law. 2004; 1: 11–19.
“The only purpose for which power can be rightly exercised over any member of a civilized community against his will is to prevent harm to others.” — John Stuart Mill. On liberty.
Bayer, op. cit. note 68.
R. Massé. 2003. Éthique et santé publique. Enjeux, valeurs et normativité. Québec. Presses de l’Université Laval.
I. Kaul, I. Grunberg, and M.A. Stern, eds. 1999. Global Public Goods. New York, Oxford University Press.
R. Chadwick. Nutrigenomics, individualism and public health. Proceedings of Nutrition Society 2004; 63: 161–66.
HUGO. 2002. HUGO Ethics Committee Statement on Genomic Databases. London. December.
R. Chadwick and S. Wilson. Genomic databases as global public goods?. Res Publica 2004; 10 (2): 123–34.
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC). Medical Research Council of Canada (MRC). Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC). 1998. Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans. Ottawa.
B. Godard et al. Data storage and DNA banking for biomedical research: informed consent, confidentiality, quality issues, ownership, return of benefits. A professional perspective. European Journal of Human Genetics 2003; December 11. S2: S82–S122.
J. Tansey et al. 2004. The foundations, applications and ethical dimensions of biobanks. Electronic Working Papers Series. W. Maurice Young Center for Applied Ethics. University of British Columbia.
Brand et al, op. cit. note 9.
Human Genome Epidemiology Network, op. cit. note 40.
The Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC). 2005. Science, society and public policy: dilemmas of public participation. Royal Society. London. 25 June. www.genomicsforum.ac.uk/documents/PDF/ScienceSocietyandPublicPolicyMeetingReport.pdf (accessed 2 August. 2006).
A. Thibault et al. 2000. Cadre de référence de la participation publique (démocratique. utile et crédible). Conseil de la santé et du bien-être. Quebec.
L. Turnbull et al. 2006. Fostering Canadians’ Role in Public Policy: A Strategy for Institutionalizing Public Involvement in Policy. Canadian Policy Research Networks. Ottawa. www.cprn.com/fr/doc.cfm?doc=1404 (accessed 2 August. 2006).
J. Chopyak et al. Public participation in science and technology decision making: trends for the future. Technology in Society. 2002; 24: 155–66.
M.M. Burgess. Public Consultation in Ethics. An Experiment in Representative Ethics. Journal of bioethical inquiry. 2003; 1 (1): 4–13.
Abelson, J. et al. Will it make a difference if a show up and share? A citizens perspective on improving public involvement processes for health system decision-making. Journal of Health Services. Research & Policy. 2004; 9 (4): 205–12.
About this article
Cite this article
Farmer, Y., Godard, B. Public Health Genomics (PHG): From Scientific Considerations to Ethical Integration. Life Sci Soc Policy 3, 14 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-5354-3-3-14
- Genomic Research
- Precautionary Principle
- Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome
- Public Health Authority
- Global Public Good