From: Ethical sharing of health data in online platforms – which values should be considered?
Platform entity | Taltioni | Healthbank | MIDATA | ePGA | PEER |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scientific value | Data quantity and quality is determined by the users who upload data. | Data quantity and quality is determined by the users who upload data. | Data quantity and quality is determined by the users who upload data. | Established genomic databases; Genomic profiles and phenotypes uploaded by users. | Data quantity and quality is determined by the users data upload. |
User protection | Privacy policy. Require users’ consent to share general data. Require users’ consent to share specific set of data. | Privacy policy. Require users’ consent for all sharable data. | Strong encryption and data access log. Only users can access their data. | Password protected profile. No information about security features yet. | Privacy policy. Users receive a system report with all the system changes (edits, data usage, etc.). |
Facilitating user agency | Users are responsible for choosing apps of interest and for the data uploaded. | Users decide whether or not to share their data and to which research studies. Members can participate in cooperative decisions. | Users decide whether or not to share their data and to which research studies. Members can participate in cooperative decisions. | Features stressing user agency might be included in the future (the platform is still underdeveloped). | Users decide whether or not to share their data and to which research studies. Users can also decide who is going to see the data. Possibility of joining patient communities. |
Trustworthiness | The services have to pass Taltioni’s audit. Disclose which data is going to be shared and with whom. | Each use of data has to be disclosed to the users. | Platform IT code is open source. Every research project will need ethical committee approval. | Developed within public sector (which might increase trust). No other relevant information is provided. | The familiar environment promoted by patient communities ensures trust in the platform. |
Benefit | Users can choose apps of their own interest and receive self-help and well-being services. ICT companies can offer paid services and develop another apps and services. | Profit (in cash or not) is divided between participant users. Private investors could also benefit (in cash or not). | Upgrade of the services provided by the platform. | Patients may benefit from different health care from the increased knowledge of health professionals in genomics. | Users can benefit from networking engagement. Researchers benefit from using data. |
Sustainability (Funding) | Cooperative of Finnish government and ICT companies. | Cooperative and associated commercial company. Investments of partners and members/users. | Users fees (users and end-users such researchers); research grants, citizen loans. | Public national and international grants. | Public and private funds and crowdsourcing. |