Skip to main content
Fig. 2 | Life Sciences, Society and Policy

Fig. 2

From: Evolutionary tinkering vs. rational engineering in the times of synthetic biology

Fig. 2

The interpretive frame of synthetic biology for understanding how live systems work. The starting is Monod’s argument (top) on how the appearance of purpose in living systems (teleonomy) is a useful tool to understand the logic of biological objects—without accepting metaphysically its reality (teleology). By the same token, the appearance of design (what I call technonomy) is an invaluable conceptual asset to make sense of the relational composition of live systems that makes them work—without adopting any belief beyond that (e.g. reality of design: technology)

Back to article page